The Case Against Benedict Arnold

During the American Revolution, Benedict Arnold first earned fame as a bold and talented general. He helped lead daring attacks at Fort Ticonderoga and played an important role in the American victory at Saratoga. Many soldiers admired his courage on the battlefield. However, Arnold’s story took a dark turn when he secretly agreed to betray the American cause. Instead of remaining a hero, he became a symbol of treason.

Arnold’s plan centered on West Point, a key American fort on the Hudson River. As commander there, he promised to hand the fort over to the British in exchange for money and a high position in the British army. If his plan had worked, British control of the river might have split the colonies and weakened the revolution. His actions put thousands of American soldiers at risk and could have changed the outcome of the war. For many Patriots, this was not just a mistake; it was a deliberate choice to help the enemy win.

Even after his plot was discovered, Arnold escaped and continued to fight for the British. American newspapers called him a traitor, and his name became an insult for anyone who betrays trust. From this point of view, Benedict Arnold’s earlier bravery cannot erase what he later did. His decision to spy for the British is seen as a selfish act that damaged the struggle for independence and broke the promises he once made to his fellow Americans.

The Case for Understanding His Espionage

While Benedict Arnold is often remembered only as a traitor, some historians encourage us to look more closely at why he turned against the American cause. Before his act of espionage, Arnold had been wounded in battle, leaving him with lasting pain and limited movement. He spent his own money to support his troops and often felt that Congress did not repay him fairly. When other officers were promoted ahead of him, Arnold believed he was being ignored and disrespected, even though he had risked his life for the revolution.

Arnold also struggled with debt and financial worries. The war made it difficult for him to support his family and keep his businesses going. At the same time, rumors and accusations were made against him, and he was placed on trial for misusing government supplies. Although he was cleared of the most serious charges, he felt deeply insulted by the way he was treated. To someone in his position, an offer of money and rank from the British might have seemed like a way to gain security and recognition he no longer believed he would receive from the Americans.

Understanding Arnold’s espionage does not mean excusing it, but it does ask us to think about how frustration, injury, and pride can influence people’s choices. His story raises difficult questions about loyalty and fairness during wartime. Was Arnold simply greedy, or did a pattern of disrespect push him toward betrayal? By exploring his motives, students can see that history is often more complicated than a simple story of “good” and “bad” characters.

Question 1 of 7

Comprehension Questions

1. Which statement best explains why many Americans saw Benedict Arnold as a serious threat to the Revolution?



2. Which detail from the “Case Against Benedict Arnold” best supports the idea that his betrayal was planned and deliberate?



3. According to the “Understanding His Espionage” passage, which factor most clearly shows why Arnold felt mistreated by the American side?



4. Which detail from the “Understanding His Espionage” passage best supports the idea that money and security influenced Arnold’s choices?



5. How do the two passages most clearly differ in the way they present Benedict Arnold?



6. Which sentence best states a main idea shared by BOTH passages?



7. Based on both passages, which question would most deepen a class discussion about Arnold’s actions?